News & Resources
-
Claim for a Stand-alone House
-
Claim for a multi-unit complex
-
Claim for a stand-alone complex
-
High Court finds that the assignment of the plaintiffs’ claim was void
-
The Supreme Court considers the interpretation of “built” in s14(a) of the WHRS Act
-
Kraal v EQC - Section 124 notices and physical loss or damage
-
The Wellington Council is unsuccessful it its claims against a director of a building company for negligent misstatement and breaches of the Fair Trading Act
-
The Court of Appeal overturns the High Court’s decision in Skyward Aviation Limited v Tower Insurance
-
High Court refuses the plaintiff’s claim for interest on his EQC entitlement
-
Grimshaw Sargeson Fellows 2014 released
-
High Court declines removal on the basis of delay
-
A Council may owe a duty to review a building consent issued by a private building certifier
-
High Court considers the duty of Council when a private certifier applies for a consent
-
High Court considers claim
-
When is an earthquake damaged property destroyed?
-
Redzone owner not entitled to TC3 foundations
-
Court of Appeal reduces contributory negligence findings to 40%
-
CA considers red zone creation and 50% payout offer
-
High Court considers the effect of an automatic reinstatement clause
-
High Court considers duty of care